Home › GFDL and CC licenses
Sat, 11/24/2007 - 05:48 — Chriswaterguy
Chriswaterguy's picture

The possibility of

The possibility of collaboration with Wikitravel might be another reason to go with CC. See my comment on my Wikitravel userpage and this positive response

(Wikitravel are CC-by-sa 1.0, i.e. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0, for some reason - is that compatible with later CC-by-sa licenses?)

It seems like we're going to have a few sites that we collaborate with (having pages that we both work on, probably using Mako's branch maintenance software quite soon - see for a related software project). And that won't include Wikipedia, but rather other wikis creating non-encyclopedic content, which are probably more likely to be CC-by-sa.

-- Chriswaterguy (wiki homepage)

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Add image
  • <ref>, </ref> around notes. <nowiki>, </nowiki> around text not to be formatted.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <sup> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <big> <small> <img> <ref> </ref> <references> <nowiki> </nowiki>
  • Allow MediaWiki syntax (limited).
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Handle "[[Page]]" (wikis), [http://... link text] (exts)
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • You can use context links in the text to create context-related links to pages or sites that provide additional information about a word or phrase.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.