Home › GFDL and CC licenses
Sat, 11/24/2007 - 06:28 — Cacahuate

I personally prefer the CC

I personally prefer the CC license over GFDL if you want to be able to more easily collaborate with other sites. GFDL is a pain, unless your main goal is to be able to directly copy info in from Wikipedia. As for Wikitravel, they started off as 1.0 and have never upgraded... we've had conversations about it, and basically believe that 1.0 and later versions are compatible, but I don't know a whoooole lot about it.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Add image
  • <ref>, </ref> around notes. <nowiki>, </nowiki> around text not to be formatted.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <sup> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <big> <small> <img> <ref> </ref> <references> <nowiki> </nowiki>
  • Allow MediaWiki syntax (limited).
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Handle "[[Page]]" (wikis), [http://... link text] (exts)
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.
  • You can use context links in the text to create context-related links to pages or sites that provide additional information about a word or phrase.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.